Pentax WS80 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
95 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
![Pentax Optio WS80 front Pentax Optio WS80 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Pentax-Optio-WS80/Pentax-WS80-front.jpg)
![Pentax WG-3 GPS front Pentax WG-3 GPS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Pentax-WG-3-GPS/Pentax-WG-3-GPS-front.jpg)
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Pentax WS80 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.8-4.7) lens
- 125g - 92 x 60 x 22mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced July 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Pentax WS80 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Pentax WS80 versus Pentax WG-3 GPS, both Waterproof digital cameras and they are both manufactured by Pentax. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the WS80 (10MP) and WG-3 GPS (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The WS80 was released 5 years earlier than the WG-3 GPS which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the WS80 grades versus the WG-3 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Pentax WS80 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax Optio WS80 and Pentax WG-3 GPS. The complete galleries are viewable at Pentax WS80 Gallery and Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WS80 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
WS80 | WG-3 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Pentax WS80
WG-3 GPS | WS80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2013 | ![]() | August 2009 | More modern by 48 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WS80 and Pentax WG-3 GPS
WS80 | WG-3 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WS80 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you should factor its weight and volume. The Pentax WS80 has got outer dimensions of 92mm x 60mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Pentax WG-3 GPS has sizing of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Pentax WS80 versus Pentax WG-3 GPS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the WS80 compared to the WG-3 GPS.
![Pentax WS80 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS size comparison Pentax WS80 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Pentax-Optio-WS80-vs-Pentax-WG-3-GPS-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the WS80 and WG-3 GPS is 95 and 90 respectively.
![Pentax WS80 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS top view buttons comparison Pentax WS80 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Pentax-Optio-WS80-vs-Pentax-WG-3-GPS-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Pentax WS80 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reading through specs. The image below will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WS80 and WG-3 GPS.
All in all, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Pentax WG-3 GPS to resolve more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged WS80 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
![Pentax WS80 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS sensor size comparison Pentax WS80 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Pentax-Optio-WS80-vs-Pentax-WG-3-GPS-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Pentax WS80 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
![Pentax WS80 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax WS80 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Pentax-Optio-WS80-vs-Pentax-WG-3-GPS-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Pentax WS80 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
Pentax Optio WS80 | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Pentax | Pentax |
Model type | Pentax Optio WS80 | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-08-05 | 2013-07-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Prime | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.8-4.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.40 m | 3.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) | 238 grams (0.52 lbs) |
Dimensions | 92 x 60 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI68 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $220 | $350 |