Pentax Q7 vs Ricoh CX2
92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff182/ff18240782b3e81fef5b6699b11da2b99c864ba8" alt="Pentax Q7 front Pentax Q7 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/103c7/103c75a67dcbfed70caf5bb728c64082ed228093" alt="Ricoh CX2 front Ricoh CX2 front"
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Pentax Q7 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 34mm
- Announced August 2013
- Succeeded the Pentax Q10
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Pentax Q7 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Pentax Q7 versus Ricoh CX2, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Pentax and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the Q7 (12MP) and CX2 (9MP) and the Q7 (1/1.7") and CX2 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The Q7 was brought out 4 years later than the CX2 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Pentax Q7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Q7 matches up against the CX2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Pentax Q7 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax Q7 & Ricoh CX2. The entire galleries are provided at Pentax Q7 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax Q7 over the Ricoh CX2
Q7 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2013 | ![]() | August 2009 | More recent by 49 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Pentax Q7
CX2 | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax Q7 and Ricoh CX2
Q7 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Pentax Q7 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Pentax Q7 features external dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Look at the Pentax Q7 versus Ricoh CX2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the Q7 compared to the CX2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52ed6/52ed6af13b6b010dc2167339784e17a234e626dd" alt="Pentax Q7 vs Ricoh CX2 size comparison Pentax Q7 vs Ricoh CX2 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Q7 and CX2 is 92 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d32cd/d32cd3d3c90ee44eb16643da197c87953402b598" alt="Pentax Q7 vs Ricoh CX2 top view buttons comparison Pentax Q7 vs Ricoh CX2 top view buttons comparison"
Pentax Q7 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements purely by seeing technical specs. The visual underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Q7 and CX2.
As you can tell, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Q7 because of its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Pentax Q7 will produce more detail having its extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more recent Q7 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa4c5/fa4c5abbab971b60253efba293f84801b18225d8" alt="Pentax Q7 vs Ricoh CX2 sensor size comparison Pentax Q7 vs Ricoh CX2 sensor size comparison"
Pentax Q7 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae96c/ae96c9b87678e4c316cedd56577f83a208d15476" alt="Pentax Q7 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax Q7 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Pentax Q7 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
Pentax Q7 | Ricoh CX2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Pentax | Ricoh |
Model | Pentax Q7 | Ricoh CX2 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-08-08 | 2009-08-20 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Pentax Q | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 8 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor, wide angle viewing, AR coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.90 m (ISO100/m) | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
Flash options | P-TTL, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | FullHD(1920x1080, 30fps/25fps/24fps), HD(1280x720,16:9,30fps/25fps/24fps), VGA(640x480,4:3,30fps/25fps/24fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 200 grams (0.44 lb) | 185 grams (0.41 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI68 | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec, 2 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC and Eye-Fi Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $480 | $341 |