Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh CX1
93 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched February 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Pentax WG-10 and Ricoh CX1, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Pentax and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-10 (14MP) and CX1 (9MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-10 was introduced 4 years after the CX1 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a brief view of how the WG-10 matches up vs the CX1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax WG-10 & Ricoh CX1. The whole galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-10 Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-10 over the Ricoh CX1
| WG-10 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2013 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 53 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Pentax WG-10
| CX1 | WG-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-10 and Ricoh CX1
| WG-10 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-10 has physical measurements of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Ricoh CX1 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Look at the Pentax WG-10 and Ricoh CX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the WG-10 compared to the CX1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-10 and CX1 is 93 and 93 respectively.
Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes simply by going through specifications. The image underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-10 and CX1.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Pentax WG-10 to provide more detail using its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The newer WG-10 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Pentax WG-10 | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Pentax | Ricoh |
| Model type | Pentax WG-10 | Ricoh CX1 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-06-21 | 2009-02-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 0.7 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 1.20 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 167 gr (0.37 pounds) | 180 gr (0.40 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $0 | $299 |