Pentax WG-10 vs Samsung TL205
93 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Pentax WG-10 vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Also Known as PL100
Pentax WG-10 vs Samsung TL205 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Pentax WG-10 and Samsung TL205, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Pentax and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-10 (14MP) and the TL205 (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-10 was brought out 3 years later than the TL205 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Pentax WG-10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the WG-10 grades versus the TL205 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax WG-10 vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax WG-10 and Samsung TL205. The entire galleries are provided at Pentax WG-10 Gallery and Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-10 over the Samsung TL205
WG-10 | TL205 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2013 | January 2010 | Fresher by 43 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Pentax WG-10
TL205 | WG-10 |
---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-10 and Samsung TL205
WG-10 | TL205 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal screen measurement | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-10 vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Pentax WG-10 enjoys physical dimensions of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Samsung TL205 has dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Compare the Pentax WG-10 and Samsung TL205 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-10 against the TL205.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-10 and TL205 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Pentax WG-10 vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by going over a spec sheet. The graphic below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-10 and TL205.
As you can see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should count on the Pentax WG-10 to deliver more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern WG-10 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-10 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax WG-10 vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
Pentax WG-10 | Samsung TL205 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Samsung |
Model | Pentax WG-10 | Samsung TL205 |
Otherwise known as | - | PL100 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2013-06-21 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.0-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 0.7 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 1.20 m | 3.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 167 gr (0.37 lb) | 177 gr (0.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $180 |