Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX1
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX1, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Pentax and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and CX1 (9MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-3 GPS was announced 4 years later than the CX1 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summation of how the WG-3 GPS scores against the CX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax WG-3 GPS & Ricoh CX1. The whole galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Ricoh CX1
| WG-3 GPS | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2013 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 54 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| CX1 | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Ricoh CX1
| WG-3 GPS | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-3 GPS provides outer dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
See the Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the WG-3 GPS vs the CX1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 GPS and CX1 is 90 and 93 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing only by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-3 GPS and CX1.
As you can see, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Pentax WG-3 GPS to give you extra detail with its extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more recent WG-3 GPS should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 GPS | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Pentax | Ricoh |
| Model | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Ricoh CX1 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-07-19 | 2009-02-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 9MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.40 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 238g (0.52 lb) | 180g (0.40 lb) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $350 | $299 |