Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX2
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97642/97642f005c0d8e683d1835fc201f1ba1eeb0e238" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS front Pentax WG-3 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/103c7/103c75a67dcbfed70caf5bb728c64082ed228093" alt="Ricoh CX2 front Ricoh CX2 front"
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced August 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
The following is a thorough review of the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Ricoh CX2, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Pentax and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The WG-3 GPS was released 3 years after the CX2 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the WG-3 GPS scores vs the CX2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax WG-3 GPS & Ricoh CX2. The complete galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Ricoh CX2
WG-3 GPS | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2013 | ![]() | August 2009 | Newer by 48 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
CX2 | WG-3 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Ricoh CX2
WG-3 GPS | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Pentax WG-3 GPS offers physical measurements of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Ricoh CX2 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Look at the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Ricoh CX2 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-3 GPS vs the CX2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a5c0/3a5c080bc1cb6a77d965edde93f24e9076522809" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 size comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 GPS and CX2 is 90 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa84b/aa84b6b04ccb6b832063323432a8d93c38713b1f" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 top view buttons comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 top view buttons comparison"
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions only by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-3 GPS and CX2.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Pentax WG-3 GPS to give more detail as a result of its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The fresher WG-3 GPS is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6c93/b6c93f47f0f241240091400b00adc76e0b357e42" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 sensor size comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 sensor size comparison"
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c041/2c041ff19ee10cd0047ed2511cee032627e01335" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
Pentax WG-3 GPS | Ricoh CX2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Pentax | Ricoh |
Model | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Ricoh CX2 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-07-19 | 2009-08-20 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.40 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 238 gr (0.52 lbs) | 185 gr (0.41 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $350 | $341 |