Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX4
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Released July 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX4, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Pentax and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-3 GPS was brought out 2 years after the CX4 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the WG-3 GPS scores against the CX4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax WG-3 GPS and Ricoh CX4. The entire galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Ricoh CX4
| WG-3 GPS | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2013 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 36 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| CX4 | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Ricoh CX4
| WG-3 GPS | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you should think about its weight and volume. The Pentax WG-3 GPS has got external dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has sizing of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX4 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the WG-3 GPS versus the CX4.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-3 GPS and CX4 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes purely by checking a spec sheet. The pic underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-3 GPS and CX4.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Pentax WG-3 GPS to give you greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The fresher WG-3 GPS should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 GPS | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Ricoh |
| Model type | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Ricoh CX4 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-07-19 | 2010-08-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.40 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 238 grams (0.52 lb) | 205 grams (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $350 | $211 |