Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX5
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Portability
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
Pentax WG-3 GPS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013
Ricoh CX5
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX5, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Pentax and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and CX5 (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-3 GPS was introduced 2 years later than the CX5 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the WG-3 GPS scores vs the CX5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax WG-3 GPS & Ricoh CX5. The whole galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery & Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Ricoh CX5
| WG-3 GPS | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2013 |  | July 2011 | Fresher by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| CX5 | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Ricoh CX5
| WG-3 GPS | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-3 GPS enjoys external dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Ricoh CX5 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX5 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the WG-3 GPS versus the CX5.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-3 GPS and CX5 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing just by looking at specifications. The photograph below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-3 GPS and CX5.
Plainly, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Pentax WG-3 GPS to resolve more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The more modern WG-3 GPS provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Pentax WG-3 GPS
Portrait photography with Ricoh CX5
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
provides face detect autofocus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
you can focus manually
no external flash support
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax WG-3 GPS Street photography advice
Ricoh CX5 Street photography advice
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
heavier than competition in class (238 grams)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (205g)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Pentax WG-3 GPS Sports photography details
Ricoh CX5 Sports photography details
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
environment proofing
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
low battery power (240 CIPA)
does not have phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
max fps low (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax WG-3 GPS as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh CX5 as a Travel photography camera
environment proofing
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
low battery power (240 per charge)
heavier than competition in class (238 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
lighter than average in class (205g)
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
great zoom (300mm)
low megapixels (10MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax WG-3 GPS Landscape photography factors
Ricoh CX5 Landscape photography factors
focusing manually
pretty wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
environment proofing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
low battery power (240 shots)
you can focus manually
relatively wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Pentax WG-3 GPS
Vlogging with Ricoh CX5
pretty wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
no mic port
heavier than competition in class (238g)
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (205 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external mic support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 GPS | Ricoh CX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Pentax | Ricoh |
| Model | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Ricoh CX5 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-07-19 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.40 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 238 gr (0.52 lb) | 205 gr (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $350 | $399 |