Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Ricoh GR Digital IV, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Pentax and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") feature totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe WG-3 GPS was announced 23 months later than the GR Digital IV which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the WG-3 GPS matches up versus the GR Digital IV with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax WG-3 GPS and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The whole galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
WG-3 GPS | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2013 | September 2011 | More recent by 23 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
GR Digital IV | WG-3 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1230k | 460k | Crisper screen (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Ricoh GR Digital IV
WG-3 GPS | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Pentax WG-3 GPS offers external measurements of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital IV has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Ricoh GR Digital IV in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the WG-3 GPS and the GR Digital IV.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 GPS and GR Digital IV is 90 and 92 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements only by going through specs. The graphic underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-3 GPS and GR Digital IV.
All in all, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-3 GPS having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Pentax WG-3 GPS will produce greater detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The younger WG-3 GPS is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Pentax WG-3 GPS | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Ricoh |
Model | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-07-19 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.40 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 238 grams (0.52 lbs) | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | 390 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $350 | $599 |