Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Also referred to as WB650
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Pentax and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-3 GPS was released 3 years after the HZ35W which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the WG-3 GPS scores against the HZ35W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung HZ35W. The complete galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Samsung HZ35W
| WG-3 GPS | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2013 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 38 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| HZ35W | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung HZ35W
| WG-3 GPS | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Pentax WG-3 GPS comes with exterior measurements of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the WG-3 GPS vs the HZ35W.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 GPS and HZ35W is 90 and 91 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by researching specs. The picture here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-3 GPS and HZ35W.
All in all, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Pentax WG-3 GPS to result in extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The younger WG-3 GPS is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called as | - | WB650 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-07-19 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.40 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 238 grams (0.52 lbs) | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $350 | $300 |