Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung PL200
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced July 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung PL200, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Pentax and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-3 GPS was brought out 3 years later than the PL200 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the WG-3 GPS scores against the PL200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung PL200. The entire galleries are available at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery and Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Samsung PL200
| WG-3 GPS | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2013 |  | July 2010 | More recent by 37 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| PL200 | WG-3 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung PL200
| WG-3 GPS | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Pentax WG-3 GPS has got external dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung PL200 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung PL200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-3 GPS and the PL200.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 GPS and PL200 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to visualise the difference in sensor measurements just by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-3 GPS and PL200.
Clearly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Pentax WG-3 GPS to provide you with extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos more aggressively. The more modern WG-3 GPS is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung PL200 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-07-19 | 2010-07-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.40 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 238g (0.52 pounds) | 170g (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $350 | $0 |