Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL102
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Samsung SL102, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Pentax and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-3 GPS was released 4 years after the SL102 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the WG-3 GPS matches up versus the SL102 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Samsung SL102
| WG-3 GPS | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2013 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 56 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| SL102 | WG-3 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung SL102
| WG-3 GPS | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Pentax WG-3 GPS has external dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Samsung SL102 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-3 GPS against the SL102.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-3 GPS and SL102 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions merely by checking specs. The pic here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-3 GPS and SL102.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Pentax WG-3 GPS to give you extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent WG-3 GPS provides an edge in sensor technology.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung SL102 |
| Also called as | - | ES55 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-07-19 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.40 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 238 grams (0.52 lb) | 116 grams (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $350 | $130 |
