Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL202
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Released July 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL50
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL202 Overview
The following is a complete assessment of the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung SL202, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Pentax and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-3 GPS was revealed 4 years after the SL202 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the WG-3 GPS matches up vs the SL202 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax WG-3 GPS & Samsung SL202. The full galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Samsung SL202
| WG-3 GPS | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2013 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 54 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| SL202 | WG-3 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung SL202
| WG-3 GPS | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Pentax WG-3 GPS features external dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung SL202 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the WG-3 GPS compared to the SL202.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-3 GPS and SL202 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by going through technical specs. The pic underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-3 GPS and SL202.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Pentax WG-3 GPS to show greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The younger WG-3 GPS should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung SL202 |
| Also called | - | PL50 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-07-19 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.40 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 238g (0.52 lbs) | 168g (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $350 | $140 |