Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL620
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Also referred to as PL65
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL620 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL620, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Pentax and Samsung. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and SL620 (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-3 GPS was brought out 4 years after the SL620 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a simple view of how the WG-3 GPS scores versus the SL620 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung SL620. The entire galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery and Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Samsung SL620
| WG-3 GPS | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2013 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 54 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| SL620 | WG-3 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung SL620
| WG-3 GPS | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-3 GPS features outer measurements of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung SL620 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL620 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-3 GPS versus the SL620.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-3 GPS and SL620 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through specs. The picture below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-3 GPS and SL620.
All in all, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Pentax WG-3 GPS to show greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The younger WG-3 GPS is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung SL620 |
| Also called | - | PL65 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2013-07-19 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.40 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 238g (0.52 lb) | 168g (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $350 | $200 |