Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL720
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
94 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Released July 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released July 2009
- Also referred to as PL70
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Samsung SL720, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Pentax and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and SL720 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-3 GPS was revealed 4 years after the SL720 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL720 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the WG-3 GPS matches up vs the SL720 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax WG-3 GPS & Samsung SL720. The full galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery & Samsung SL720 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Samsung SL720
| WG-3 GPS | SL720 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 49 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL720 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| SL720 | WG-3 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung SL720
| WG-3 GPS | SL720 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Pentax WG-3 GPS features external dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL720 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Samsung SL720 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-3 GPS vs the SL720.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WG-3 GPS and SL720 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes only by researching specifications. The pic here might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-3 GPS and SL720.
Plainly, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Pentax WG-3 GPS to render greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent WG-3 GPS will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung SL720 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung SL720 |
| Otherwise known as | - | PL70 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2013-07-19 | 2009-07-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.40 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 238 gr (0.52 lbs) | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $350 | $119 |