Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung ST65
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung ST65 Overview
The following is a extensive overview of the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Samsung ST65, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Pentax and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-3 GPS was released 2 years after the ST65 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a brief summation of how the WG-3 GPS scores vs the ST65 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax WG-3 GPS & Samsung ST65. The complete galleries are available at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery & Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Samsung ST65
WG-3 GPS | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2013 | January 2011 | Newer by 31 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
ST65 | WG-3 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung ST65
WG-3 GPS | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Identical display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-3 GPS offers physical dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Samsung ST65 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the WG-3 GPS and the ST65.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-3 GPS and ST65 is 90 and 99 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by checking out technical specs. The pic underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-3 GPS and ST65.
As you have seen, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Pentax WG-3 GPS to produce extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The fresher WG-3 GPS should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung ST65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Pentax | Samsung |
Model | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung ST65 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2013-07-19 | 2011-01-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | - |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | () |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.40 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 238g (0.52 lb) | - |
Dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $350 | $130 |