Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL205
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Also referred to as PL100
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL205 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL205, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Pentax and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and TL205 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-3 GPS was unveiled 3 years after the TL205 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summation of how the WG-3 GPS scores versus the TL205 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax WG-3 GPS & Samsung TL205. The full galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery & Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Samsung TL205
| WG-3 GPS | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 43 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| TL205 | WG-3 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung TL205
| WG-3 GPS | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Pentax WG-3 GPS provides outside measurements of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL205 has specifications of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check the Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL205 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-3 GPS and the TL205.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 GPS and TL205 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through specs. The pic below should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-3 GPS and TL205.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Pentax WG-3 GPS to result in greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more recent WG-3 GPS should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung TL205 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung TL205 |
| Alternative name | - | PL100 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2013-07-19 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.40 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 238 gr (0.52 lb) | 177 gr (0.39 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $350 | $180 |