Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL240
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternative Name is ST5000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL240 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung TL240, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Pentax and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-3 GPS was brought out 3 years after the TL240 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the WG-3 GPS matches up versus the TL240 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax WG-3 GPS & Samsung TL240. The entire galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery & Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Samsung TL240
| WG-3 GPS | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2013 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 43 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| TL240 | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung TL240
| WG-3 GPS | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-3 GPS comes with outside dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung TL240 has measurements of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung TL240 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-3 GPS compared to the TL240.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-3 GPS and TL240 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching technical specs. The picture below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-3 GPS and TL240.
As you can tell, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Pentax WG-3 GPS to provide you with greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The newer WG-3 GPS should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung TL240 |
| Also called as | - | ST5000 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2013-07-19 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 4800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.40 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 238g (0.52 pounds) | 160g (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $350 | $171 |