Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL240
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternative Name is ST5000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL240 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung TL240, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Pentax and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-3 GPS was brought out 3 years after the TL240 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the WG-3 GPS matches up versus the TL240 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax WG-3 GPS & Samsung TL240. The entire galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery & Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Samsung TL240
| WG-3 GPS | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2013 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 43 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| TL240 | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung TL240
| WG-3 GPS | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-3 GPS comes with outside dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung TL240 has measurements of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung TL240 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-3 GPS compared to the TL240.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-3 GPS and TL240 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching technical specs. The picture below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-3 GPS and TL240.
As you can tell, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Pentax WG-3 GPS to provide you with greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The newer WG-3 GPS should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung TL240 |
| Also called as | - | ST5000 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2013-07-19 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 4800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.40 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 238g (0.52 pounds) | 160g (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $350 | $171 |