Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Released July 2013
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Older Model is Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Later Model is Sigma DP3 Merrill
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Here is a detailed overview of the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Sigma DP2 Merrill, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Pentax and Sigma. The resolution of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is very comparable but the WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) posses different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-3 GPS was revealed 18 months later than the DP2 Merrill making them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the WG-3 GPS matches up versus the DP2 Merrill in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sigma DP2 Merrill. The full galleries are available at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery and Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
WG-3 GPS | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2013 | February 2012 | Fresher by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
DP2 Merrill | WG-3 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sigma DP2 Merrill
WG-3 GPS | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Pentax WG-3 GPS comes with outer measurements of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Merrill has specifications of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") and a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
See the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Sigma DP2 Merrill in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-3 GPS versus the DP2 Merrill.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 GPS and DP2 Merrill is 90 and 83 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizing only by checking out technical specs. The graphic underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-3 GPS and DP2 Merrill.
As you have seen, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WG-3 GPS with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Pentax WG-3 GPS will produce extra detail because of its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images way more aggressively. The younger WG-3 GPS provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Pentax WG-3 GPS | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Pentax | Sigma |
Model | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-07-19 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4704 x 3136 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.40 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 640x480 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 238 gr (0.52 pounds) | 330 gr (0.73 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $350 | $931 |