Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma Quattro H
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Sigma Quattro H, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Pentax and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) posses totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-3 GPS was unveiled 3 years prior to the Quattro H and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the WG-3 GPS grades against the Quattro H with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax WG-3 GPS & Sigma sd Quattro H. The full galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Sigma Quattro H
| WG-3 GPS | Quattro H |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| Quattro H | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2016 | July 2013 | Fresher by 31 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1620k | 460k | Clearer screen (+1160k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sigma Quattro H
| WG-3 GPS | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera, you should factor its weight and volume. The Pentax WG-3 GPS has got outside dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro H has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Sigma Quattro H in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the WG-3 GPS and the Quattro H.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-3 GPS and Quattro H is 90 and 78 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to see the difference between sensor sizing only by reading through specs. The graphic here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-3 GPS and Quattro H.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The WG-3 GPS having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sigma Quattro H will give extra detail having an extra 29 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older WG-3 GPS is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 GPS | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Sigma |
| Model | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Sigma sd Quattro H |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2013-07-19 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 476.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 45 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6200 x 4152 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.4 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 1,620k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.8fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.40 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 238g (0.52 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $350 | $1,134 |