Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma Quattro H
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Sigma Quattro H, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Pentax and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) posses totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-3 GPS was unveiled 3 years prior to the Quattro H and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the WG-3 GPS grades against the Quattro H with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax WG-3 GPS & Sigma sd Quattro H. The full galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Sigma Quattro H
| WG-3 GPS | Quattro H |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| Quattro H | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2016 | July 2013 | Fresher by 31 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1620k | 460k | Clearer screen (+1160k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sigma Quattro H
| WG-3 GPS | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera, you should factor its weight and volume. The Pentax WG-3 GPS has got outside dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro H has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Sigma Quattro H in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the WG-3 GPS and the Quattro H.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-3 GPS and Quattro H is 90 and 78 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to see the difference between sensor sizing only by reading through specs. The graphic here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-3 GPS and Quattro H.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The WG-3 GPS having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sigma Quattro H will give extra detail having an extra 29 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older WG-3 GPS is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 GPS | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Sigma |
| Model | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Sigma sd Quattro H |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2013-07-19 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 476.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 45 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6200 x 4152 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.4 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 1,620k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.8fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.40 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 238g (0.52 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $350 | $1,134 |