Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony RX1
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41


79 Imaging
69 Features
57 Overall
64
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony RX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0-22.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Released February 2013

Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony RX1 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony RX1, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Pentax and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and RX1 (24MP) and the WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") and RX1 (Full frame) possess totally different sensor size.

The WG-3 GPS was brought out 5 months later than the RX1 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the WG-3 GPS grades vs the RX1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony RX1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax WG-3 GPS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1. The entire galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery & Sony RX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Sony RX1
WG-3 GPS | RX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX1 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
RX1 | WG-3 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sony RX1
WG-3 GPS | RX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2013 | ![]() | February 2013 | Similar age |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony RX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-3 GPS has external dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1 has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") along with a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Compare the Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony RX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-3 GPS against the RX1.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 GPS and RX1 is 90 and 79 respectively.

Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony RX1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through specifications. The graphic here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-3 GPS and RX1.
To sum up, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-3 GPS featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Sony RX1 will give you greater detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively.

Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony RX1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony RX1 Specifications
Pentax WG-3 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Pentax | Sony |
Model | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-07-19 | 2013-02-19 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0-22.0 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.40 m | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 238g (0.52 lbs) | 482g (1.06 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 93 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 2534 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | 270 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $350 | $2,798 |