Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony T900
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
96 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony T900 Overview
The following is a extensive assessment of the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sony T900, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Pentax and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-3 GPS was brought out 4 years after the T900 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the WG-3 GPS scores vs the T900 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Sony T900
| WG-3 GPS | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2013 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 54 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| T900 | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+462k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sony T900
| WG-3 GPS | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-3 GPS offers exterior measurements of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Contrast the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sony T900 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-3 GPS and the T900.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-3 GPS and T900 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over specs. The image below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-3 GPS and T900.
All in all, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Pentax WG-3 GPS to deliver more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher WG-3 GPS should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Sony |
| Model | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2013-07-19 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.40 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 238g (0.52 lbs) | 143g (0.32 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $350 | $300 |
