Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony TX1
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched August 2009
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony TX1 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Sony TX1, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Pentax and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") and TX1 (1/2.4") have totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe WG-3 GPS was launched 4 years later than the TX1 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the WG-3 GPS scores against the TX1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony TX1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax WG-3 GPS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The complete galleries are available at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery & Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Sony TX1
WG-3 GPS | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2013 | August 2009 | More recent by 49 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
TX1 | WG-3 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sony TX1
WG-3 GPS | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera, you have to consider its weight and size. The Pentax WG-3 GPS features exterior dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sony TX1 has specifications of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Sony TX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the WG-3 GPS vs the TX1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 GPS and TX1 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph below should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-3 GPS and TX1.
Clearly, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WG-3 GPS because of its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Pentax WG-3 GPS will provide more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The newer WG-3 GPS will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony TX1 Specifications
Pentax WG-3 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Sony |
Model | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2013-07-19 | 2009-08-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 8cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1250s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.40 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 238 grams (0.52 lbs) | 142 grams (0.31 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $350 | $350 |