Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony TX9
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
95 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony TX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Released July 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
- Introduced July 2010
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony TX9 Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Sony TX9, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Pentax and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and TX9 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-3 GPS was launched 3 years later than the TX9 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony TX9 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the WG-3 GPS scores vs the TX9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony TX9 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax WG-3 GPS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9. The complete galleries are available at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery & Sony TX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Sony TX9
WG-3 GPS | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2013 | July 2010 | More recent by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX9 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
TX9 | WG-3 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Sharper display (+462k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sony TX9
WG-3 GPS | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony TX9 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and size. The Pentax WG-3 GPS provides outer measurements of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Sony TX9 has specifications of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Sony TX9 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-3 GPS compared to the TX9.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-3 GPS and TX9 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony TX9 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading specs. The graphic here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-3 GPS and TX9.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Pentax WG-3 GPS to offer you more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The newer WG-3 GPS will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony TX9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony TX9 Specifications
Pentax WG-3 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Pentax | Sony |
Model type | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Released | 2013-07-19 | 2010-07-08 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.40 m | 3.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (50 fps), 1440 x 1080 (50, 25fps), 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 238 gr (0.52 lbs) | 149 gr (0.33 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $350 | $799 |