Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony W320
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
97 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Released July 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony W320 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sony W320, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Pentax and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and the W320 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-3 GPS was brought out 3 years after the W320 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the WG-3 GPS grades against the W320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony W320 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The entire galleries are available at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery and Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Sony W320
| WG-3 GPS | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2013 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 43 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| W320 | WG-3 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sony W320
| WG-3 GPS | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Pentax WG-3 GPS has got outside dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Sony W320 has sizing of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sony W320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the WG-3 GPS compared to the W320.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 GPS and W320 is 90 and 97 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading through specs. The pic underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-3 GPS and W320.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Pentax WG-3 GPS to give you extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent WG-3 GPS provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony W320 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Sony |
| Model type | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2013-07-19 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.7-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.40 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 238 gr (0.52 pounds) | 117 gr (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $350 | $269 |
