Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX3
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80d48/80d4829e27b270a372b152ea9a2e896de139bf15" alt="Pentax WG-3 front Pentax WG-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b47f9/b47f930de28b117873fba531eee680f0fd88065c" alt="Ricoh CX3 front Ricoh CX3 front"
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released June 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX3, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Pentax and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-3 (16MP) and CX3 (10MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The WG-3 was brought out 3 years after the CX3 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the WG-3 scores versus the CX3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax WG-3 and Ricoh CX3. The entire galleries are available at Pentax WG-3 Gallery and Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Ricoh CX3
WG-3 | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2013 | ![]() | June 2010 | More modern by 38 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Pentax WG-3
CX3 | WG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Ricoh CX3
WG-3 | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-3 has got outside measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Ricoh CX3 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-3 versus the CX3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a3d1/8a3d1cc42343f7dfa25dacadf5b41c3676824d1e" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX3 size comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX3 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-3 and CX3 is 90 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66dd3/66dd3da474c252aaceb26488cd0589dc2fb41254" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX3 top view buttons comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX3 top view buttons comparison"
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes simply by checking out specs. The image underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-3 and CX3.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Pentax WG-3 to show extra detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more recent WG-3 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/358df/358df10119d928f58715a0814547975f4c943f70" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX3 sensor size comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX3 sensor size comparison"
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f94b1/f94b1193c9909bda257b129407eb291238b1642f" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
Pentax WG-3 | Ricoh CX3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Ricoh |
Model | Pentax WG-3 | Ricoh CX3 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-07-19 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.40 m | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $300 | $329 |