Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here is a detailed overview of the Pentax WG-3 versus Ricoh WG-M1, both Waterproof digital cameras by manufacturers Pentax and Ricoh. The image resolution of the WG-3 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-3 was introduced 14 months before the WG-M1 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the WG-3 matches up versus the WG-M1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax WG-3 & Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| WG-3 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+345k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Pentax WG-3
| WG-M1 | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | July 2013 | Fresher by 14 months |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Ricoh WG-M1
| WG-3 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-3 enjoys outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Pentax WG-3 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the WG-3 vs the WG-M1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-3 and WG-M1 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading through specs. The photograph below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-3 and WG-M1.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can anticipate the Pentax WG-3 to give greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The older WG-3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Pentax | Ricoh |
| Model | Pentax WG-3 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-07-19 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | (1×) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.40 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | 350 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $2,000 |
