Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung CL5
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL10
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung CL5 Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung CL5, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Pentax and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the WG-3 (16MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the WG-3 (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") feature different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-3 was manufactured 4 years after the CL5 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the WG-3 matches up versus the CL5 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax WG-3 and Samsung CL5. The entire galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 Gallery and Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Samsung CL5
WG-3 | CL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2013 | February 2009 | Newer by 54 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Pentax WG-3
CL5 | WG-3 |
---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung CL5
WG-3 | CL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Pentax WG-3 has physical dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung CL5 has dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung CL5 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the WG-3 and the CL5.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-3 and CL5 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture here may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-3 and CL5.
As you can see, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WG-3 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Pentax WG-3 will provide you with more detail due to its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The fresher WG-3 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
Pentax WG-3 | Samsung CL5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Pentax | Samsung |
Model type | Pentax WG-3 | Samsung CL5 |
Also referred to as | - | PL10 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2013-07-19 | 2009-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 9MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-4.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.40 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lb) | 141 gr (0.31 lb) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $300 | $391 |