Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung CL80
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternate Name is ST5500
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung CL80, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Pentax and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-3 (16MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is relatively well matched and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-3 was revealed 3 years after the CL80 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a concise summary of how the WG-3 grades versus the CL80 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax WG-3 & Samsung CL80. The full galleries are available at Pentax WG-3 Gallery & Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Samsung CL80
| WG-3 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2013 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 43 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Pentax WG-3
| CL80 | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.7" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung CL80
| WG-3 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Pentax WG-3 has got outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung CL80 has sizing of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung CL80 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the WG-3 and the CL80.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-3 and CL80 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by looking at a spec sheet. The picture here may give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-3 and CL80.
As you can see, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can count on the Pentax WG-3 to give greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more modern WG-3 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 | Samsung CL80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model | Pentax WG-3 | Samsung CL80 |
| Also called as | - | ST5500 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-07-19 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 4800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.40 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 160 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $300 | $400 |