Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80d48/80d4829e27b270a372b152ea9a2e896de139bf15" alt="Pentax WG-3 front Pentax WG-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a851/5a851ef78e48f8e044878a725f768ce7cb93cf0c" alt="Samsung GX-1L front Samsung GX-1L front"
69 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Introduced February 2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Pentax and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the WG-3 (16MP) and GX-1L (6MP) and the WG-3 (1/2.3") and GX-1L (APS-C) offer totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The WG-3 was manufactured 7 years after the GX-1L which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1L being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the WG-3 scores vs the GX-1L with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax WG-3 & Samsung GX-1L. The entire galleries are available at Pentax WG-3 Gallery & Samsung GX-1L Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Samsung GX-1L
WG-3 | GX-1L | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2013 | ![]() | February 2006 | Newer by 91 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 210k | Sharper screen (+250k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1L over the Pentax WG-3
GX-1L | WG-3 |
---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung GX-1L
WG-3 | GX-1L | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-3 has physical measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung GX-1L has proportions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 570 grams (1.26 lbs).
Analyze the Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-3 compared to the GX-1L.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3061/a3061a3e5dcfbcaeececd4e475e4be8b54a6085f" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L size comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-3 and GX-1L is 90 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/379c4/379c4fe69350b927b3711bc99ae60b3ec1bc594c" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L top view buttons comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L top view buttons comparison"
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions purely by going over specifications. The pic here will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-3 and GX-1L.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WG-3 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Pentax WG-3 will deliver extra detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more recent WG-3 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25e9b/25e9b6453c5a3622d5b3e5f5830ced3c70d1d876" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L sensor size comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L sensor size comparison"
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0094b/0094b063ede978c7e127986dbebda2df9cfa992d" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Specifications
Pentax WG-3 | Samsung GX-1L | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Pentax | Samsung |
Model | Pentax WG-3 | Samsung GX-1L |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2013-07-19 | 2006-02-24 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3008 x 2008 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 5 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 210k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.40 m | 7.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 570 grams (1.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/MMC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $300 | $0 |