Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
69 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Introduced February 2006
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Pentax and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the WG-3 (16MP) and GX-1L (6MP) and the WG-3 (1/2.3") and GX-1L (APS-C) offer totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-3 was manufactured 7 years after the GX-1L which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1L being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the WG-3 scores vs the GX-1L with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax WG-3 & Samsung GX-1L. The entire galleries are available at Pentax WG-3 Gallery & Samsung GX-1L Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Samsung GX-1L
| WG-3 | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2013 | February 2006 | Newer by 91 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 210k | Sharper screen (+250k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1L over the Pentax WG-3
| GX-1L | WG-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung GX-1L
| WG-3 | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-3 has physical measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung GX-1L has proportions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 570 grams (1.26 lbs).
Analyze the Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-3 compared to the GX-1L.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-3 and GX-1L is 90 and 69 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions purely by going over specifications. The pic here will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-3 and GX-1L.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WG-3 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Pentax WG-3 will deliver extra detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more recent WG-3 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 | Samsung GX-1L | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model | Pentax WG-3 | Samsung GX-1L |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2013-07-19 | 2006-02-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 200 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 5 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 210k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.40 m | 7.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 570 grams (1.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/MMC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $300 | $0 |