Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ35W
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB650
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ35W, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Pentax and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the WG-3 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-3 was released 3 years after the HZ35W which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the WG-3 scores versus the HZ35W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax WG-3 & Samsung HZ35W. The complete galleries are available at Pentax WG-3 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Samsung HZ35W
| WG-3 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2013 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 38 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Pentax WG-3
| HZ35W | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung HZ35W
| WG-3 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-3 has outside dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view scale comparison of the WG-3 vs the HZ35W.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 and HZ35W is 90 and 91 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading specs. The picture underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-3 and HZ35W.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Pentax WG-3 to deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent WG-3 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model | Pentax WG-3 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB650 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-07-19 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.40 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $300 | $300 |