Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung NX200
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80d48/80d4829e27b270a372b152ea9a2e896de139bf15" alt="Pentax WG-3 front Pentax WG-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38f0d/38f0dc583c55a9184eb37f69fb4892978bbd0cfe" alt="Samsung NX200 front Samsung NX200 front"
90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Superseded the Samsung NX100
- Refreshed by Samsung NX210
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Below is a comprehensive overview of the Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung NX200, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Pentax and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-3 (16MP) and the NX200 (20MP) is fairly similar but the WG-3 (1/2.3") and NX200 (APS-C) feature different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The WG-3 was released 17 months later than the NX200 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the WG-3 matches up vs the NX200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax WG-3 and Samsung NX200. The complete galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-3 Gallery and Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Samsung NX200
WG-3 | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2013 | ![]() | February 2012 | More recent by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Pentax WG-3
NX200 | WG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung NX200
WG-3 | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Pentax WG-3 features outside measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung NX200 has dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Examine the Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung NX200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the WG-3 compared to the NX200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8e6e/a8e6ef8d6a807749e3332835fa59e70aed2f6b0e" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung NX200 size comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung NX200 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-3 and NX200 is 90 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d058/8d058e58b73bb6b05b3cc577056227c29b523780" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung NX200 top view buttons comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung NX200 top view buttons comparison"
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by going over a spec sheet. The visual below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-3 and NX200.
As you can see, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-3 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Samsung NX200 will offer more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer WG-3 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d71af/d71afc1f0fa688f3130bdb68f8fd0f5aa1a9690d" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung NX200 sensor size comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung NX200 sensor size comparison"
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39803/39803e8bd2d8c698e4df1ff546122a00b3394eb0" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
Pentax WG-3 | Samsung NX200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Pentax | Samsung |
Model | Pentax WG-3 | Samsung NX200 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2013-07-19 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.40 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 223 grams (0.49 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 618 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | 330 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $300 | $818 |