Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL220
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
95 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 169g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Announced August 2009
- Additionally Known as ST500
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL220 Overview
Below is a complete comparison of the Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL220, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Pentax and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the WG-3 (16MP) and TL220 (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-3 was unveiled 3 years later than the TL220 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the WG-3 scores vs the TL220 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL220 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax WG-3 & Samsung TL220. The full galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 Gallery & Samsung TL220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Samsung TL220
| WG-3 | TL220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2013 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 48 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL220 over the Pentax WG-3
| TL220 | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung TL220
| WG-3 | TL220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL220 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-3 features physical measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL220 has proportions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 169 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL220 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the WG-3 vs the TL220.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the WG-3 and TL220 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL220 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading through specifications. The visual here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-3 and TL220.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Pentax WG-3 to resolve more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The fresher WG-3 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL220 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL220 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 | Samsung TL220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model | Pentax WG-3 | Samsung TL220 |
| Alternate name | - | ST500 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-07-19 | 2009-08-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.40 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 169 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $300 | $90 |