Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL240
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally referred to as ST5000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Pentax WG-3 versus Samsung TL240, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Pentax and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-3 (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is very similar and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-3 was brought out 3 years after the TL240 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the WG-3 grades vs the TL240 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax WG-3 and Samsung TL240. The entire galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-3 Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Samsung TL240
| WG-3 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 43 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Pentax WG-3
| TL240 | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung TL240
| WG-3 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-3 enjoys outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has proportions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Pentax WG-3 versus Samsung TL240 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the WG-3 vs the TL240.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 and TL240 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions purely by going over technical specs. The pic below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-3 and TL240.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should expect to see the Pentax WG-3 to deliver extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images far more aggressively. The younger WG-3 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model | Pentax WG-3 | Samsung TL240 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ST5000 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2013-07-19 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 4800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.40 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 160g (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $300 | $171 |