Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB210
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
              
              94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
 - 3" Fixed Screen
 - ISO 125 - 6400
 - Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
 - 1920 x 1080 video
 - 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
 - 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
 - Revealed July 2013
 
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
 - 3.5" Fixed Display
 - ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
 - Optical Image Stabilization
 - 1280 x 720 video
 - 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
 - 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
 - Released July 2011
 
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms        Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung WB210, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Pentax and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-3 (16MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-3 was manufactured 2 years after the WB210 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the WG-3 grades against the WB210 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary        Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax WG-3 & Samsung WB210. The entire galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-3 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Samsung WB210
| WG-3 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 | July 2011 | Newer by 25 months | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 1k | Crisper display (+459k dot) | 
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Pentax WG-3
| WB210 | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate | 
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung WB210
| WG-3 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | 
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Pentax WG-3 provides external dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
See the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung WB210 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-3 and the WB210.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-3 and WB210 is 90 and 94 respectively.
          Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading technical specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-3 and WB210.
As you can tell, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Pentax WG-3 to offer you extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The newer WG-3 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
          Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
        
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide        Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
        
                
        Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Samsung | 
| Model | Pentax WG-3 | Samsung WB210 | 
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom | 
| Revealed | 2013-07-19 | 2011-07-19 | 
| Body design | Compact | Compact | 
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD | 
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" | 
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² | 
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP | 
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 | 
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 | 
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 3200 | 
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 | 
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - | 
| Cross focus points | - | - | 
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens | 
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.9-5.9 | 
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm | 
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 | 
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | 
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch | 
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1 thousand dot | 
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - | 
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None | 
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s | 
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s | 
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | - | 
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.40 m | 3.50 m | 
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | 
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 | 
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG | 
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None | 
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | 
| GPS | None | None | 
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 174g (0.38 pounds) | 
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested | 
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - | 
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - | 
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - | 
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | 
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal | 
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 | 
| Cost at release | $300 | $279 |