Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB210
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Released July 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung WB210, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Pentax and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-3 (16MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-3 was manufactured 2 years after the WB210 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the WG-3 grades against the WB210 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax WG-3 & Samsung WB210. The entire galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-3 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Samsung WB210
| WG-3 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 | July 2011 | Newer by 25 months | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 1k | Crisper display (+459k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Pentax WG-3
| WB210 | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung WB210
| WG-3 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Pentax WG-3 provides external dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
See the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung WB210 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-3 and the WB210.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-3 and WB210 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading technical specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-3 and WB210.
As you can tell, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Pentax WG-3 to offer you extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The newer WG-3 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model | Pentax WG-3 | Samsung WB210 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-07-19 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.40 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 174g (0.38 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $300 | $279 |