Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB250F
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
93 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung WB250F, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Pentax and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-3 (16MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-3 was unveiled 7 months later than the WB250F and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the WG-3 scores vs the WB250F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax WG-3 & Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-3 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Samsung WB250F
| WG-3 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 | January 2013 | More recent by 7 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Pentax WG-3
| WB250F | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung WB250F
| WG-3 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-3 enjoys outside dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung WB250F has measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the WG-3 vs the WB250F.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-3 and WB250F is 90 and 93 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to see the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking specifications. The graphic below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-3 and WB250F.
Plainly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Pentax WG-3 to give more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more modern WG-3 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax WG-3 | Samsung WB250F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-07-19 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.40 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $300 | $250 |