Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB350F

On this page, we will be matching up the Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB350F, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Pentax and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-3 (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The WG-3 was introduced 5 months before the WB350F so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief view of how the WG-3 scores vs the WB350F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax WG-3 & Samsung WB350F. The whole galleries are available at Pentax WG-3 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.

In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Pentax WG-3 provides external dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

See the Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung WB350F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-3 vs the WB350F.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-3 and WB350F is 90 and 90 respectively.

Typically, its difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions merely by seeing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-3 and WB350F.

As you can see, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution so you can expect comparable quality of files but you have to factor the launch date of the cameras into account.