Pentax WG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80d48/80d4829e27b270a372b152ea9a2e896de139bf15" alt="Pentax WG-3 front Pentax WG-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f04d9/f04d99e0c26c31be60485c208bc04019fbc69c93" alt="Sigma DP2 Merrill front Sigma DP2 Merrill front"
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Pentax WG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Announced February 2012
- Succeeded the Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Refreshed by Sigma DP3 Merrill
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Let's look more closely at the Pentax WG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Pentax and Sigma. The resolution of the WG-3 (16MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is relatively similar but the WG-3 (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The WG-3 was launched 18 months later than the DP2 Merrill which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the WG-3 grades vs the DP2 Merrill in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax WG-3 & Sigma DP2 Merrill. The complete galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-3 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
WG-3 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2013 | ![]() | February 2012 | More recent by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Pentax WG-3
DP2 Merrill | WG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Sigma DP2 Merrill
WG-3 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Pentax WG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-3 has physical measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Merrill has proportions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") accompanied by a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Look at the Pentax WG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the WG-3 compared to the DP2 Merrill.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04f00/04f00b9e4dc07a074190c6925af9d192f3651511" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill size comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-3 and DP2 Merrill is 90 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34e54/34e54a48ac6a80d23a9e77a2da3ef453c543656a" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill top view buttons comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill top view buttons comparison"
Pentax WG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading specifications. The visual underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-3 and DP2 Merrill.
To sum up, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WG-3 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Pentax WG-3 will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The fresher WG-3 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a891/5a89196adfda87ee4680dae44092ed3f4ce0a4e1" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill sensor size comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill sensor size comparison"
Pentax WG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0de82/0de8212cb0230e722fc858f379bc19f9769b5346" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Pentax WG-3 | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Pentax | Sigma |
Model | Pentax WG-3 | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-07-19 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4704 x 3136 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.40 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 640x480 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 330 grams (0.73 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $300 | $931 |