Pentax WG-3 vs Sony A200
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41


66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Pentax WG-3 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Launched July 2008
- Newer Model is Sony A230

Pentax WG-3 vs Sony A200 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Pentax WG-3 versus Sony A200, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Pentax and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the WG-3 (16MP) and A200 (10MP) and the WG-3 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor dimensions.

The WG-3 was announced 5 years later than the A200 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a concise overview of how the WG-3 scores vs the A200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax WG-3 vs Sony A200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax WG-3 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The whole galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Sony A200
WG-3 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2013 | ![]() | July 2008 | More recent by 61 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Pentax WG-3
A200 | WG-3 |
---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Sony A200
WG-3 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-3 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-3 comes with outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony A200 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Look at the Pentax WG-3 versus Sony A200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the WG-3 compared to the A200.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-3 and A200 is 90 and 66 respectively.

Pentax WG-3 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements simply by viewing specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-3 and A200.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-3 with its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Pentax WG-3 will result in more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher WG-3 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Pentax WG-3 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Pentax WG-3 vs Sony A200 Specifications
Pentax WG-3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Pentax | Sony |
Model type | Pentax WG-3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2013-07-19 | 2008-07-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.40 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 572 gr (1.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $300 | $100 |