Pentax WG-3 vs Sony HX200V
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
66 Imaging
41 Features
55 Overall
46
Pentax WG-3 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Introduced May 2012
- Older Model is Sony HX100V
- New Model is Sony HX300
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Pentax WG-3 vs Sony HX200V Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Pentax WG-3 vs Sony HX200V, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Pentax and Sony. The resolution of the WG-3 (16MP) and the HX200V (18MP) is pretty comparable and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-3 was launched 15 months later than the HX200V which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the WG-3 matches up vs the HX200V in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Pentax WG-3 vs Sony HX200V Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax WG-3 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The complete galleries are available at Pentax WG-3 Gallery and Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Sony HX200V
| WG-3 | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2013 | May 2012 | Fresher by 15 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Pentax WG-3
| HX200V | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Sony HX200V
| WG-3 | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Pentax WG-3 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-3 offers physical dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony HX200V has proportions of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") having a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Look at the Pentax WG-3 vs Sony HX200V in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the WG-3 and the HX200V.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-3 and HX200V is 90 and 66 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out technical specs. The visual underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-3 and HX200V.
As you have seen, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Sony HX200V to show more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more recent WG-3 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-3 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Pentax WG-3 vs Sony HX200V Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Pentax | Sony |
| Model type | Pentax WG-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-07-19 | 2012-05-11 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.40 m | 12.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 583 gr (1.29 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | 450 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $300 | $480 |