Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX4
65 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27217/27217068f8c9495080b1e05c8e540f967ef1c3d8" alt="Pentax X-5 front Pentax X-5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e742/4e74284e98f8a2f698e6b96487e93d8958a78f02" alt="Ricoh CX4 front Ricoh CX4 front"
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-580mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 595g - 119 x 86 x 107mm
- Introduced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced August 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX4, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Pentax and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the X-5 (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The X-5 was manufactured 2 years after the CX4 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Pentax X-5 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the X-5 scores against the CX4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax X-5 and Ricoh CX4. The entire galleries are viewable at Pentax X-5 Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax X-5 over the Ricoh CX4
X-5 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2012 | ![]() | August 2010 | Newer by 25 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Pentax X-5
CX4 | X-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax X-5 and Ricoh CX4
X-5 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Pentax X-5 comes with external dimensions of 119mm x 86mm x 107mm (4.7" x 3.4" x 4.2") and a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX4 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the X-5 against the CX4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82245/82245dac83945f27b3cb81716b01ab25f509f98a" alt="Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X-5 and CX4 is 65 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c723a/c723aed4b0bdbdf1918466af79b096ca330355a9" alt="Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison"
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specifications. The image below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the X-5 and CX4.
Plainly, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Pentax X-5 to provide you with greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos more aggressively. The more recent X-5 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eed6e/eed6e33e246ddae2cd9bce8330e259a25327d786" alt="Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison"
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/469fc/469fcc74d643c0178caef42225f5e1118c6ef94e" alt="Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
Pentax X-5 | Ricoh CX4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Ricoh |
Model type | Pentax X-5 | Ricoh CX4 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-08-22 | 2010-08-19 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 22-580mm (26.4x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 230k dot | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 595g (1.31 lbs) | 205g (0.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 86 x 107mm (4.7" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $230 | $211 |