Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh WG-4
65 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-580mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 595g - 119 x 86 x 107mm
- Released August 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Pentax and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the X-5 (16MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe X-5 was brought out 17 months earlier than the WG-4 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Pentax X-5 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a quick view of how the X-5 matches up versus the WG-4 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax X-5 & Ricoh WG-4. The entire galleries are viewable at Pentax X-5 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax X-5 over the Ricoh WG-4
X-5 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Pentax X-5
WG-4 | X-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | August 2012 | Fresher by 17 months |
Common features in the Pentax X-5 and Ricoh WG-4
X-5 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Exact same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Pentax X-5 offers outer dimensions of 119mm x 86mm x 107mm (4.7" x 3.4" x 4.2") and a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the X-5 and the WG-4.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X-5 and WG-4 is 65 and 90 respectively.
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading specifications. The visual underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the X-5 and WG-4.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical megapixels so you can expect similar quality of photographs however you will want to consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The older X-5 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
Pentax X-5 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Ricoh |
Model type | Pentax X-5 | Ricoh WG-4 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Released | 2012-08-22 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 22-580mm (26.4x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 230 thousand dot | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 595 grams (1.31 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 86 x 107mm (4.7" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 240 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $230 | $330 |