Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh WG-M1
65 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-580mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 595g - 119 x 86 x 107mm
- Announced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Below is a thorough review of the Pentax X-5 versus Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Pentax and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the X-5 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe X-5 was manufactured 3 years before the WG-M1 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Pentax X-5 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the X-5 grades versus the WG-M1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax X-5 and Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are provided at Pentax X-5 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax X-5 over the Ricoh WG-M1
X-5 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 115k | Crisper screen (+345k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Pentax X-5
WG-M1 | X-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2014 | August 2012 | More recent by 25 months |
Common features in the Pentax X-5 and Ricoh WG-M1
X-5 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Pentax X-5 features outside measurements of 119mm x 86mm x 107mm (4.7" x 3.4" x 4.2") and a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Pentax X-5 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the X-5 versus the WG-M1.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X-5 and WG-M1 is 65 and 91 respectively.
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to see the gap in sensor measurements purely by seeing technical specs. The visual underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the X-5 and WG-M1.
As you have seen, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Pentax X-5 to provide extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older X-5 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Pentax X-5 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Pentax | Ricoh |
Model type | Pentax X-5 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2012-08-22 | 2014-09-12 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 22-580mm (26.4x) | (1×) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 1.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 115k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 230k dot | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 595 gr (1.31 lb) | 190 gr (0.42 lb) |
Dimensions | 119 x 86 x 107mm (4.7" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 350 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $230 | $2,000 |