Pentax X70 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
71 Imaging
34 Features
34 Overall
34
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Pentax X70 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 410g - 110 x 83 x 90mm
- Launched March 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Pentax X70 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Pentax X70 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Pentax and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the X70 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe X70 was introduced 6 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Pentax X70 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the X70 grades against the WG-4 GPS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax X70 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax X70 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The whole galleries are provided at Pentax X70 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax X70 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
X70 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Pentax X70
WG-4 GPS | X70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | March 2009 | Fresher by 60 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax X70 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
X70 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Pentax X70 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Pentax X70 has got physical measurements of 110mm x 83mm x 90mm (4.3" x 3.3" x 3.5") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Analyze the Pentax X70 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the X70 compared to the WG-4 GPS.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the X70 and WG-4 GPS is 71 and 90 respectively.
Pentax X70 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by viewing specifications. The photograph below will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the X70 and WG-4 GPS.
Plainly, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to provide you with extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older X70 will be behind in sensor tech.
Pentax X70 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax X70 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Pentax X70 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Pentax | Ricoh |
Model | Pentax X70 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-03-02 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 pounds) | 235g (0.52 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 83 x 90mm (4.3" x 3.3" x 3.5") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $200 | $210 |