Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
69 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 111 x 85 x 110mm
- Announced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Updated by Ricoh WG-6
Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
The following is a comprehensive assessment of the Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Pentax and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the X90 (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe X90 was revealed 5 years prior to the WG-5 GPS which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Pentax X90 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the X90 matches up vs the WG-5 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax X90 & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The full galleries are available at Pentax X90 Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax X90 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
X90 | WG-5 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Pentax X90
WG-5 GPS | X90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | July 2010 | Newer by 56 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax X90 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
X90 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Pentax X90 has got outside dimensions of 111mm x 85mm x 110mm (4.4" x 3.3" x 4.3") along with a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Look at the Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the X90 against the WG-5 GPS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the X90 and WG-5 GPS is 69 and 90 respectively.
Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions purely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the X90 and WG-5 GPS.
Clearly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to result in more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged X90 will be behind in sensor tech.
Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Pentax X90 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Ricoh |
Model | Pentax X90 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2010-07-06 | 2015-02-10 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Prime | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 428g (0.94 pounds) | 236g (0.52 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 85 x 110mm (4.4" x 3.3" x 4.3") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-L106 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $350 | $500 |