Pentax X90 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
69 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Pentax X90 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 111 x 85 x 110mm
- Revealed July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Launched August 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Pentax X90 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Overview
Below is a in-depth assessment of the Pentax X90 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Pentax and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the X90 (12MP) and Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe X90 was launched 3 years earlier than the Galaxy Camera 3G and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Pentax X90 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the X90 grades versus the Galaxy Camera 3G with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Pentax X90 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax X90 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G. The complete galleries are viewable at Pentax X90 Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax X90 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
| X90 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Pentax X90
| Galaxy Camera 3G | X90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2012 |  | July 2010 | More recent by 26 months |
| Display dimension | 4.8" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+2.1") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Pentax X90 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
| X90 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Pentax X90 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Pentax X90 has got external dimensions of 111mm x 85mm x 110mm (4.4" x 3.3" x 4.3") having a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G has specifications of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Take a look at the Pentax X90 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the X90 versus the Galaxy Camera 3G.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X90 and Galaxy Camera 3G is 69 and 90 respectively.
Pentax X90 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading technical specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the X90 and Galaxy Camera 3G.
As you have seen, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G to offer greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The older X90 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Pentax X90 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Pentax X90 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Specifications
| Pentax X90 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax X90 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2012-08-29 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Prime | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | - |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 4.8 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.10 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 428 grams (0.94 lbs) | 305 grams (0.67 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 85 x 110mm (4.4" x 3.3" x 4.3") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | D-L106 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $350 | $606 |