Pentax X90 vs Samsung SL102
69 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Pentax X90 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 111 x 85 x 110mm
- Announced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
Pentax X90 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Pentax X90 versus Samsung SL102, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Pentax and Samsung. The resolution of the X90 (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe X90 was released 19 months later than the SL102 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Pentax X90 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the X90 matches up against the SL102 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax X90 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax X90 and Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are provided at Pentax X90 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax X90 over the Samsung SL102
X90 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2010 | January 2009 | Fresher by 19 months | |
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Pentax X90
SL102 | X90 |
---|
Common features in the Pentax X90 and Samsung SL102
X90 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Pentax X90 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Pentax X90 has got external measurements of 111mm x 85mm x 110mm (4.4" x 3.3" x 4.3") accompanied by a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Pentax X90 versus Samsung SL102 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the X90 compared to the SL102.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X90 and SL102 is 69 and 96 respectively.
Pentax X90 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing simply by checking specs. The visual underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the X90 and SL102.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Pentax X90 to give greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent X90 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Pentax X90 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax X90 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Pentax X90 | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Pentax | Samsung |
Model type | Pentax X90 | Samsung SL102 |
Also Known as | - | ES55 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-07-06 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Prime | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m | - |
Flash options | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 428g (0.94 lb) | 116g (0.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 85 x 110mm (4.4" x 3.3" x 4.3") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | D-L106 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $350 | $130 |