Pentax X90 vs Samsung TL500
69 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Pentax X90 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 111 x 85 x 110mm
- Released July 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Announced July 2010
- Alternate Name is EX1
Pentax X90 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Pentax X90 versus Samsung TL500, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Pentax and Samsung. The image resolution of the X90 (12MP) and the TL500 (10MP) is very well matched but the X90 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe X90 was revealed within a month of the TL500 and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Pentax X90 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung TL500 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the X90 matches up versus the TL500 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax X90 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax X90 & Samsung TL500. The full galleries are viewable at Pentax X90 Gallery & Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax X90 over the Samsung TL500
X90 | TL500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Pentax X90
TL500 | X90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Pentax X90 and Samsung TL500
X90 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2010 | July 2010 | Similar age | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Pentax X90 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Pentax X90 features outer measurements of 111mm x 85mm x 110mm (4.4" x 3.3" x 4.3") having a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Samsung TL500 has dimensions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Look at the Pentax X90 versus Samsung TL500 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the X90 and the TL500.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the X90 and TL500 is 69 and 88 respectively.
Pentax X90 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through a spec sheet. The picture here should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the X90 and TL500.
Clearly, the 2 cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The X90 with its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Pentax X90 will give extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images way more aggressively.
Pentax X90 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax X90 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Pentax X90 | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Pentax | Samsung |
Model | Pentax X90 | Samsung TL500 |
Also referred to as | - | EX1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-07-06 | 2010-07-09 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Prime | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m | 5.20 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 428 grams (0.94 lbs) | 386 grams (0.85 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 85 x 110mm (4.4" x 3.3" x 4.3") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery model | D-L106 | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $350 | $527 |