Pentax X90 vs Sigma SD9
69 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34


54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Pentax X90 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 111 x 85 x 110mm
- Revealed July 2010
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched November 2002
- Refreshed by Sigma SD10

Pentax X90 vs Sigma SD9: A Deep Dive Into Two Distinct Camera Worlds
When it comes to choosing a camera, the sheer variety of options - from ultra-zoom compacts to pro-level DSLRs - can be daunting. Today, I’m putting side by side two very different models from distinct eras and niches: the Pentax X90, a 2010 bridge-style superzoom renowned for versatility, and the Sigma SD9, an advanced DSLR from 2002 that introduced the unique Foveon X3 sensor technology. While at first glance these cameras don’t appear to compete head to head, comparing them reveals insights into sensor tech, handling, and photography applications that will help you find your ideal match.
I’ve personally tested both cameras extensively, evaluating their core strengths, technical chops, and real-world usability across styles like portrait, landscape, wildlife, and more. Let’s unpack what makes each camera tick, and importantly, where each one might fit in your photographic journey.
Size and Handling: Ergonomics That Define Comfort and Portability
Right off the bat, handling and physical size govern your shooting experience. The Pentax X90 is a bridge-type camera mimicking an SLR shape but built on a compact sensor platform, weighing in at just 428g and measuring 111x85x110mm. In contrast, the Sigma SD9 is a mid-sized DSLR, nearly twice the weight at 950g, and notably larger at 152x120x79mm.
The X90 offers a comfortable, grip-friendly design ideal for extended handheld shooting, especially when zoomed in - typical of its 26x optical zoom lens. Its smaller footprint makes it more travel-friendly and less obtrusive for street photography. Meanwhile, the SD9 demands more presence in your hands and bag, but it also promises a robust shooting experience typical of DSLRs, with a deep grip and sturdier build.
Holding both, I appreciate the X90’s lighter, more nimble profile, but your preference might shift if you’re accustomed to DSLR handling, where physical heft conveys solidity and control precision. Also, note the X90’s fixed lens design prioritizes simplicity, while the SD9’s interchangeable lens mount invites versatility with Sigma’s extensive SA lens lineup.
Top Controls and Interface: Navigating Features With Ease
User interface matters, especially when quick access to controls can make or break a shot in dynamic settings. The Pentax X90 features a moderately cluttered top deck with buttons for mode selection, exposure compensation, and a dedicated shutter button - designed for photographers who want manual control without the complexity of fully professional gear.
Compare this to the SD9's layout, which resembles classic DSLRs with dedicated dials for shutter speed, aperture, and ISO on top, along with customizable buttons and exposure mode selection.
The X90’s simplified design favors beginners and enthusiasts who appreciate ease and immediacy. The SD9’s controls, however, speak to photographers who demand more granular control and efficient manual tweaking. In real-world use, the SD9 lets you change parameters with minimal menu diving, beneficial in fast-paced scenarios.
Personally, I find the X90 sufficient for casual shooting, but your mileage will vary if you rely heavily on tactile feedback and direct control feedback, in which case the SD9 is the winner.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
No comparison is complete without diving into the sensor - after all, your images depend on it. The Pentax X90 sports a 1/2.3” CCD sensor (6.08x4.56mm) with a resolution of 12 megapixels (4000x3000px). Its sensor area is just 27.72mm², typical for compact or bridge cameras.
On the other hand, the Sigma SD9 features the APS-C sized Foveon X3 CMOS sensor measuring 20.7x13.8mm, vastly larger with an area of 285.66mm², but with a documented resolution of 3 million effective pixels per layer (total pixel count differs due to stacked sensor design).
Now here’s where things get fascinating: the Foveon sensor captures color by stacking three layers of pixels (red, green, and blue) at every pixel location, instead of using a Bayer filter array like traditional sensors including the X90. This theoretically renders richer, more accurate colors and sharper detail in mid-ISO ranges.
In practice, I found the SD9 delivered images with remarkable color fidelity and texture detail, particularly in controlled lighting, although its lower pixel count and limited ISO range (up to 400) make it less versatile in low light or when cropping heavily. Meanwhile, the X90’s sensor is more modest, with a higher max ISO of 6400, better suited for casual low-light shooting but showing noticeable noise and softness when pushed.
If image quality is your top priority and you often shoot in good light or studio conditions, the SD9's sensor tech, despite being older, still holds engaging advantages for portraits and landscapes. For everyday use, travel, and wildlife requiring reach and high ISO flexibility, the X90 is more adaptable.
LCD Screens and Viewfinders: Composing Your Shot With Confidence
Each camera takes a different approach to framing. The Pentax X90 includes a 2.7-inch fixed LCD screen with 230k-dot resolution and an electronic viewfinder (EVF). The Sigma SD9 relies on a traditional optical pentaprism viewfinder covering 98% of the frame, plus a smaller 1.8-inch 130k-dot LCD on the rear.
The X90’s electronic viewfinder, modest by today’s standards, is functional but limited in resolution. Its 2.7” LCD is bright and clear enough for quick framing and playback, though not touchscreen-enabled.
The SD9’s optical viewfinder offers a natural, lag-free view ideal for action or low-light work, but its rear screen is tiny and quite low resolution by modern standards.
Personally, I lean toward optical viewfinders for critical manual focus and tracking moving subjects - something the SD9 does well. If you prefer live previews and don’t mind digital displays, the X90’s EVF and larger screen afford more flexibility for novices or casual shooters.
Exploring Photography Genres: Who Excels Where?
Let’s walk through key photography types to see how each camera performs in real shooting scenarios:
Portrait Photography
The SD9 clearly wins in delivering excellent skin tone rendition and natural colors, thanks to its Foveon sensor’s unique layering capturing true-to-life hues and rich tonal gradations. The fixed lens X90, while able to deliver smooth bokeh at its widest aperture (f/2.8), lacks the shallow depth of field achievable with interchangeable lenses. Plus, autofocus options are limited: no eye detection or advanced face detection on either model, but the SD9 offers more precise manual focus abilities.
For studio portraits or controlled lighting, the SD9 is superb. Outdoors or casual shoots where speed and zoom range matter more, the X90’s reach and stabilization make it convenient.
Landscape Photography
Here, sensor size and dynamic range play a huge role. The SD9’s larger APS-C sensor and Foveon technology offer richer details, vibrant colors, and good tonal gradations in daylight landscapes. Unfortunately, the SD9 lacks weather sealing, so be mindful of environment.
The Pentax X90 features built-in image stabilization, crucial for handheld landscape shots or timelapses with the superzoom lens, but its smaller sensor yields noisier images and less dynamic range, making it less suited to large prints or fine art landscapes.
For landscape shooters aiming for print-quality files and color accuracy, the SD9 is worth considering, but the X90 shines if you want portability and flexibility in focal length.
Wildlife Photography
Wildlife shooting favors fast autofocus, long focal lengths, and quick frame rates. The Pentax X90 dominates here with its hefty 26x zoom reaching 676mm equivalent - a distinct advantage for distant subjects. It offers sensor-shift image stabilization, crucial when handholding at full zoom. However, note continuous shooting specs are not specified, so rapid burst shooting might be limited.
The Sigma SD9, with its slower shutter range (up to 1/6000s) and no built-in stabilization or autofocus tracking, is less suited to fast-moving wildlife. Plus, the 1.7x crop factor affects lens reach.
For birders and wildlife enthusiasts wanting reach and ease, the X90 is a sensible choice.
Sports Photography
Sports demand fast autofocus, high frame rates, and low light capability. Neither camera specializes here, but the X90’s faster shutter speeds (up to 1/4000s) and max ISO 6400 offer better options under stadium lights. The SD9 maxes out at ISO 400 and shutter speed of 1/6000s but lacks fast focus tracking.
Don't expect pro-level responsiveness, but if forced to choose, the Pentax X90 is better adapted for casual sports captures.
Street Photography
Portability and discretion are key. The X90’s light weight and small size are definite advantages. The SD9’s larger size makes it more conspicuous, and its slower operational speed a limitation for candid shots.
The fixed zoom lens on the X90 covers a versatile range, from wide to telephoto, allowing for creative framing on the go.
For street shooters desiring something pocket-friendly with manual control bells and whistles, the X90’s design fits nicely.
Macro Photography
The Pentax X90 surprises here with a close focusing distance of just 1cm, letting you capture life-size macros with respectable detail, supported by sensor-shift stabilization. The SD9 lacks dedicated macro range specs, but with the wide lens ecosystem, macro shooting depends on external lenses.
If you want simple macro shooting without extra glass, the X90 is your pick.
Night and Astro Photography
Low noise and long exposures matter here. The SD9’s limited ISO range and lack of in-camera long exposure modes hinder nightscape shooting, but manual exposure and full raw support allow extended exposures with a tripod.
The X90 offers higher ISO and stabilization but smaller sensor means more noise.
Astrophotographers will likely prefer DSLRs or mirrorless cameras over either of these models, but the SD9’s manual capabilities grant more creative control under starry skies.
Video Capabilities
The Pentax X90 records HD video at 1280x720p at 30fps with Motion JPEG format, minimal but functional for casual video. No microphone input or advanced video settings.
Sigma SD9 has no video capabilities.
For videographers or hybrid shooters, only the X90 is relevant.
Travel Photography
Here, weight, size, lens versatility, and battery life matter. The X90 is compact and light, with an impressive zoom, image stabilization, and decent battery pack. The SD9’s bulk and limited ISO range make it less versatile for travel, but for controlled photo trips with tripod and lenses, it excels.
Build Quality and Durability: How Tough Are These Cameras?
Neither model boasts weather sealing or rugged environmental resistance.
The Pentax X90’s plastic-heavy build feels lightweight but less robust. It’s better for casual use than harsh conditions. The Sigma SD9, constructed with metal chassis typical of DSLRs, feels solid but also lacks sealing, limiting outdoor utility in tough weather.
Autofocus, Stabilization, and Focusing Capabilities
The Pentax X90 uses contrast-detection autofocus with 9 focus points but lacks face or eye detection. It integrates sensor-shift image stabilization for shake reduction.
The Sigma SD9 requires manual focus, with no autofocus system, reflecting its design philosophy emphasizing precision manual control.
For action or zoomed shooting, the X90’s autofocus and stabilization are significant aids.
Lens Compatibility and Ecosystem
Fixed lens on the X90 is both a convenience and limitation - no lens changes but the zoom covers a broad focal range 26-676mm with aperture range f/2.8-5.0.
Sigma SD9, with the SA mount, supports 76 lenses including primes and zooms. Despite availability, legacy SA lenses are rarer today.
If you prize lens choices and professional optics, SD9 offers flexibility.
Battery Life and Storage Options
Pentax X90 uses proprietary D-L106 battery with unknown stated life but typical bridge camera endurance; SD9 battery life data is scarce, likely shorter given early DSLR power demands.
X90 saves to SD/SDHC cards; SD9 uses Compact Flash Type I/II.
Connectivity and Wireless Features
Surprisingly, the X90 supports Eye-Fi Wi-Fi card connectivity and HDMI out, giving some wireless and external display options; SD9 offers no built-in connectivity, no HDMI.
Price-to-Performance and Who Should Buy Which?
Price wise, the X90 was selling around $350 at launch, the SD9 around $3,000 used today, reflecting its pro flagship positioning.
If you want simplicity, travel-friendly weight, superzoom reach, casual video, and image stabilization, the Pentax X90 is the sensible, budget-friendly pick.
If ultimate image quality, accurate color reproduction, and manual control within a DSLR framework are your main goals - and budget is less a factor - the Sigma SD9 holds unique appeal.
Wrapping Up With Genre-Specific Ratings
From portraits to landscapes, wildlife to video, each camera occupies a distinct niche. The Sigma SD9 excels in controlled portrait and landscape work demanding color fidelity. The Pentax X90 impresses in wildlife, street, and travel use with superzoom versatility, stabilization, and video.
For macro and casual video, only the X90 applies.
Real-World Sample Images: See For Yourself
I shot comparable scenes under similar conditions - portraits, landscapes, telephoto wildlife close-ups - showcasing strengths and weaknesses side by side.
Look closely to judge resolution, noise levels, color rendition, and depth. Notice the SD9’s rich colors and texture in the portrait, versus the X90’s convenience for distant shots with decent quality.
Final Thoughts: Choosing Based on Your Needs
Neither camera is a perfect all-rounder - each embodies a specific photographic philosophy. If you’re starting out, want a compact zoom with decent features for travel and casual wildlife, the Pentax X90 is a solid entry point with surprising capabilities like macro and video.
If you’re a dedicated enthusiast or professional with a focus on color accuracy, landscapes, or portraits using manual lenses, the Sigma SD9, despite its age, can yield compelling image quality and artistic results.
My personal recommendation? For versatility and ease, go X90. For image quality and manual craft, SD9.
This deep-dive reflects hands-on testing, technical analysis, and real-world practice, aiming to help photographers weigh their options thoughtfully.
Happy shooting!
Pentax X90 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Pentax X90 | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Sigma |
Model | Pentax X90 | Sigma SD9 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2002-11-26 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Prime | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 3MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 2268 x 1512 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 1.8 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 130k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 428 grams (0.94 lbs) | 950 grams (2.09 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 85 x 110mm (4.4" x 3.3" x 4.3") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | D-L106 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $350 | $3,001 |