Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh CX2
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Revealed July 2014
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Pentax XG-1 and Ricoh CX2, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Pentax and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the XG-1 (16MP) and CX2 (9MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XG-1 was announced 4 years later than the CX2 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the XG-1 grades against the CX2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax XG-1 and Ricoh CX2. The whole galleries are available at Pentax XG-1 Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Ricoh CX2
| XG-1 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2014 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 60 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Pentax XG-1
| CX2 | XG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax XG-1 and Ricoh CX2
| XG-1 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Pentax XG-1 enjoys exterior dimensions of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Ricoh CX2 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check out the Pentax XG-1 and Ricoh CX2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the XG-1 compared to the CX2.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XG-1 and CX2 is 66 and 93 respectively.
Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to see the gap in sensor sizing simply by seeing specs. The photograph here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the XG-1 and CX2.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Pentax XG-1 to show extra detail with its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger XG-1 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Pentax XG-1 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Pentax | Ricoh |
| Model type | Pentax XG-1 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-07-15 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1248mm (52.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dot | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 9.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash modes | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 567g (1.25 lb) | 185g (0.41 lb) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LB-060 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $599 | $341 |